Certainly! Here’s a rephrased version of the provided text:
What are your overall sentiments?
I’m generally inclined to be pessimistic, but I take it you’re inquiring about the final election outcomes. Good instinct. By nature, I often anticipate the worst—this was also my mindset during the European Parliament elections. However, I currently feel optimistic about our chances of winning.
There are five potential scenarios for the morning of April 13: Tisza could achieve a clear or two-thirds victory, or Fidesz might win similarly. It’s also possible that Tisza garners the highest number of votes, yet Fidesz and Mi Hazánk could attain a parliamentary majority. Several of these outcomes, though, are unlikely.
Which scenario seems most probable?
Nationwide, it’s evident that Tisza is not only gaining momentum but has actually surpassed expectations, as reflected in the polls. Presently, we appear to be nearing the two-thirds majority threshold. Much hinges on our ability to mobilize the over 3 million voters needed for that majority on election day. We are a well-organized and robust community with over 50,000 volunteers, while Fidesz relies solely on paid personnel. Signs suggest that voter turnout in Tisza is exceptionally high, nearly at 100%. In the next ten days, we need to concentrate on ensuring these voters actually head to the polls, while also engaging potential new supporters.
So, is the goal to achieve a two-thirds majority?
I’ve repeatedly explained why achieving a two-thirds majority is crucial. This country has been under a permanent two-thirds governance for 16 years, and we can see the pitfalls of such a system—even though Viktor Orbán aimed for a two-thirds mandate in 2010 to restore order. What assurance do we have that Tisza won’t follow in Fidesz’s footsteps?
We aim for a two-thirds majority not to create a „Fidesz 2.” Our desire is not for unbridled power, but to re-establish a system of checks and balances, implement a new electoral law, and enshrine in the Constitution that the prime minister can serve only two terms. This would allow us to expedite the removal of the Fidesz affiliates sustaining this corrupt and inhumane regime. The current situation is markedly different from 2010. We are transparent about our intentions, and the Tisza community is diverse. We genuinely believe that there’s no right or left, just Hungarians, with our supporters, voters, and candidates coming from various backgrounds. The Tisza Islands, which underpin our political community, also serve as a safeguard. We have no propaganda, and we won’t align ourselves with oligarchs.
When Fidesz secured a two-thirds majority in 2010, the Simicska empire was already backing them. Unlike Fidesz back then, we have no hidden agendas, having clearly outlined our commitments beforehand—including the limitation of the prime minister’s terms in the constitution. This is how a party can provide guarantees; political assurances can’t merely be notarized. After April, we will face two significant challenges: appointing a faction leader for Tisza and a head for the National Asset Recovery and Protection Office.
Do you have candidates in mind?
Are you asking that seriously?
Yes, I am.
If you need further modifications or summaries, just let me know!
Forrás 24.hu
